MP High Court Says Rapist Was ‘Kind Enough’ To Leave Victim Alive, Reduces Punishment

In today’s dose of ‘WTH News’, we bring to you a verdict from Madhya Pradesh High Court which is sure to blow your mind. The Indore bench of the High Court was hearing a case of a man, identified as Ram Singh (40), convicted for raping a four-year-old girl in Indore in 2007, reported Hindustan Times.

Representative Image

Ram was arrested and sentenced to life imprisonment by an additional sessions judge (Indore) in April 2009. However, he wasn’t satisfied with the verdict and decided to challenge the order saying that he was falsely implicated.

Now, while hearing his plea on September 28, a bench of Justices Subodh Abhyankar and Satyendra Kumar Singh observed that looking at his ‘demonic’ act, they don’t think the case is fit to reduce his sentence. However, they also observed that since the culprit was ‘kind enough’ to leave the victim alive after the heinous act, they reduced his tenure, reported News18.

This is exactly what the court quoted:

“The court does not find any error in appreciation of evidence by the trial court and considering the demonic act of the appellant who appears to have no respect for the dignity of a woman and has the propensity to commit sexual offence even with a girl child aged 4 years, this Court does not find it to be a fit case where the sentence can be reduced to the sentence already undergone by him, however, considering the fact that he was kind enough to leave the prosecutrix (girl) alive, this court is of the opinion that the life imprisonment can be reduced to 20 years’ rigorous imprisonment.”

And as expected, this historic verdict received a lot of criticism online.

After so much social media outrage, the judges decided to review their verdict and eventually passed a modified order, changing the word ‘kind’ and calling it an “inadvertent mistake”, reported News18.

In the updated order, the court modified the sentence “he was kind enough to leave the prosecutrix alive” to “he did not cause any other physical injury to the victim”.

What are your views on this case?

📣 Storypick is now on Telegram! Click here to join our channel (@storypick) and never miss another great story.